Contents of Patterns in Pythagoras
1. Patterns in Right Triangles and Pythagorean Triples
1. Introduction
2. Finding Right Triangles with Integral Sides
3. Primitive Pythagorean Triples and Triangles
4. A Generating Formula for Primitive Pythagorean Triples
5. Properties of Primitive Pythagorean Triples
6. Areas and Perimeters of Complete Right Triangles
2. More Patterns in Right Triangles and Pythagorean Triples
1. Introduction
2. Possible Values for a
3. Possible Values for b
4. Possible Values for c
3. Even More Patterns in Right Triangles and Pythagorean Triple
1. The Relative Sizes of a, b, and c
3A 2. Regular and Inverted Triples
3. Proper Primitive Pythagorean Triples
3B 4. Unit and Constant Difference Triples
3C 5. Complete Primitive Pythagorean Triples
4. Still More Patterns in Right Triangles and Pythagorean Triples
1. Multiplication of Primitive Pythagorean Triples
2. Division of Pythagorean Triples
3. Powers of Primitive Pythagorean Triples
4. The Square Root of Primitive Pythagorean triples
5. Two New Pythagorean Triples (1,0,1) and (0,0,0)
6. Adding Primitive Pythagorean Triples
7. Subtracting Complete Primitive Pythagorean triples
8. Negative Pythagorean triples
9. The Distributive property for Pythagorean Triples
5. Further Patterns in Right Triangles andPythagorean Triples
1. Multiplication Of Pythagorean Triples by a Constant
2. Solving Pythagorean Triple Equations
3. Complete Pythagorean Triples and Vector Spaces
4. Some Notable Patterns (The 3-4-5 and 5-12-13 patterns)
5. Generating Pythagorean Triples from the Fibonacci Sequence
6. Constructing a Triple whose c-value Is c2
Patterns in Pythagoras
4. Still More Patterns in Right Triangles
and Pythagorean Triples
David W. Hansen
© 2008
In Parts 1 , 2, 3A, 3B, and 3C, we discovered many beautiful patterns existing among the sides of primitive right triangles or the members of primitive Pythagorean triples. But apparently, we are still not through! Yes, there are STILL more patterns to be found in primitive right triangles and Pythagorean triples! But what’s left to discover? Well, c’mon, let’s see!
1. Multiplication of Primitive Pythagorean Triples
Is there a way to multiply two primitive Pythagorean triples together? If so, what should be the rule of multiplication? Can we discover a rule for multiplication that makes sense? Let’s give it a try.
First, we would like the product of two primitive Pythagorean triples to be itself a primitive Pythagorean triple, and it seems natural to want the a-value of the product of the triples to be the product of the two a-values of the triples. For example, if we were to multiply (3,4,5) by (5,12,13), we would want their product to be
(3x5, b, c) = (15, b1, c1),
where b1 and c1 would be those values which make this product triple a primitive Pythagorean triple. But what should b1 and c1 be?
Suppose we multiply two triples together by multiplying their a-values together, their b-values together, and their c-values together. Then, we would have, for example,
(3, 4, 5) x (5, 12, 13) = (3x5, 4x12, 5x13) = (15, 48, 65),
which is not even a Pythagorean triple, since 152 + 482 = 2529 ¹ 652 = 4225. So, this method of multiplication won’t work.
Now, what if we multiply a primitive Pythagorean triple (a, b, c) by itself? We get
(a, b, c) x (a, b, c) = (a2, ?, ?).
Since (a, b, c) is a Pythagorean triple, then a2 + b2 = c2, or a2 = c2 – b2, which gives us (c2 – b2, ?, ?). Now what? Well, doesn’t the c2 – b2, since it is the a-value of our product, remind us of m2 – n2, which is the a-value of a primitive triple in terms of m and n? Then, couldn’t the b-value of our product possibly be 2bc, like the 2mn which is the b-value of a primitive triple? And couldn’t the c-value be b2 + c2, like the m2 + n2 which is the c-value of a primitive triple? Let’s try it and see!
Accordingly, we have (a, b, c) x (a, b, c) = (a2, 2bc, b2 + c2),
and if (a, b, c) = (3, 4, 5), we find that
(3, 4, 5) x (3, 4, 5) = (3x3, 2x4x5, 42 + 52) = (9, 40, 41),
which IS a primitive Pythagorean triple, since 9, 40, and 41 have no common factors, and 92 + 402 = 412.
Let’s look at another example. (5, 12, 13) x (5, 12, 13) = ( 5x5, 2x12x13, 122 + 132 ) = (25, 312, 313),
and (25, 312, 313) is a primitive Pythagorean triple. It looks we’ve done it! We have found a way to multiply two primitive triples together and get 1) another primitive triple, and 2) a triple whose a-value is the product of the a-values of our two triples.
However, our method of multiplication is good only for multiplying a triple by itself. How can we multiply two different primitive Pythagorean triples? Let’s take a closer look at the product of (a, b, c) with itself to get some ideas. Now,
(a, b, c) x (a, b, c) = ( a2, 2bc, b2 + c2 ),
which can be written as = ( aa, bc + cb, bb + cc ), which says
1) the a-value of the product is the product of the a-value of the first triple(say a1)and the a-value of the second triple (say a2). Thus, the a-value of the product is a1a2.
2) the b-value of the product is the product of the b value of the first triple (say b1) and the c-value of the second triple (say c2) plus the product of the c-value of the first triple (say c1) and the b-value of the second triple
(say b2). Thus, the b-value of the product is b1c2 + c1b2.
3) The c-value of the product is the product of the b value of the first triple (b1) and the b-value of the second triple (b2) plus the product of the c-value of the first triple (c1) and the c-value of the second triple (c2). Thus, the c-value of the product is b1b2 + c1c2.
So, using the patterns above for two primitive triples (a1, b1, c1) and (a2, b2, c2), we get
Multiplication of Pythagorean triples
If (a1, b1, c1) and (a2, b2, c2) are two Pythagorean triples, then
(a1, b1, c1) x (a2, b2, c2) = ( a1a2, b1c2 + c1b2, b1b2 + c1c2 ). (1)
______________________________________________________
Will this always work? Let’s see.
Example 1. (3, 4, 5) x (5, 12, 13) = (3x5, 4x13 + 5x12, 4x12 + 5x13) = (15, 112, 113), which is a primitive Pythagorean triple.
Example 2. (21, 20, 29) x (65, 72, 97) = (21x65, 20x97 + 29x72, 20x72 + 29x97) = (1365, 4028, 4253), which is also a primitive Pythagorean triple.
So, yes, it works, at least for these two examples! But, in general, can we expect that the product triple
(a1a2, b1c2 + c1b2, b1b2 + c1c2 ) from (1) above will always be a primitive Pythagorean triple? Let’s see.
First, we must show that this product triple is a Pythagorean triple; namely, that
(a1a2)2 + (b1c2 + c1b2)2 = (b1b2 + c1c2)2. (2)
Now, since (a1, b1, c1) and (a2, b2, c2) are Pythagorean triples, we know that
a12 + b12 = c12, or a12 = c12 –b12, (3)
and a22 + b22 = c22, or a22 = c22 – b22. (4)
So, starting with the left-hand side of (2) above, we have
(a1a2)2 + (b1c2 + c1b2)2 = a12a22 + b12c22 + 2b1c2c1b2 + c12b22.
Substituting from (3) and (4) for a12 and a22, we get
= (c12 - b12)( c22 – b22) + b12c22 + 2b1c2c1b2 + c12b22.
= c12c22 – c12b22 – b12c22 + b12b22 + b12c22 + 2b1c2c1b2 + c12b22
= c12c22 + b12b22 + 2b1c2c1b2 = b12b22 + 2b1c2c1b2 + c12c22
= (b1b2 + c1c2)2, which is the right-hand side of (2).
Thus, we have proved (2), and the product of two Pythagorean triples is always a Pythagorean triple.
But is this product of two Pythagorean triples a primitive Pythagorean triple? Sadly, the answer is not always. For example,
a) (5,12, 13) x (15, 8,17) = (5x15, 12x17 + 13x8, 12x8 + 13x17) = (75, 308, 317), which is a
primitive Pythagorean triple, but
b) (3, 4, 5) x (33, 56,65) = (3x33, 4x65 + 5x56, 4x56 + 5x85) = (99, 540, 549) = (9x11, 9x 60, 9x 61), which is NOT a primitive Pythagorean triple even though (3,4,5) and (33, 56, 65) are primitive triples. We see that 9 is a factor of each member of the triple, and we also see the primitive triple (11,60, 61) “embedded” in the product triple.
Let’s write down the products of a few primitive Pythagorean triples and try to find out when the product triples are primitive and when they are not. Using (1), we get
Table 1
Product Common Embedded
Factors Product primitive? factor triple
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1. (3, 4, 5) x (5, 12, 13) = (15, 112, 113) Yes None
2. (3, 4, 5) x (15, 8, 17) = (45, 108, 117) No 9 (5,12,13)
3. (3, 4, 5) x (33, 56, 65) = (99, 540, 549) No 9 (11,60,61)
4. (5,12,13) x (15, 8, 17) = (75, 308, 317) Yes None
5. (5,12,13) x (33, 56, 65) = (165, 1400, 1517) Yes None
6. (5,12,13) x (35,12,37) = (175, 600, 625) No 25 (7,24,25)
7. (7,24,25) x (63,16,65) = (441, 1960, 2009) No 49 (9,40,41)
8. (7,24,25) x (15, 8,17) = (105, 608, 617) Yes None
9. (15, 8,17) x (35,12,37) = (525, 500, 725) No 25 (21,20,29)
10. (15, 8,17) x (21,20,29) = (315, 572, 653) Yes None
11. (15, 8,17) x (21,220,221) = (315, 5508, 5517) No 9 (35,612,613)
12. (15,112,113 x (21,20,29) = (315, 5508, 5517) No 9 (35,612,613)
13. (15,112,113) x (21,220,221) = (315, 49612, 49613) Yes None
Looking at the table above, we can see that for those product triples which are not primitive, their common factors are all perfect squares. (See 2, 3, 6, 7, 9, 11, and 12.) And there is more. Let’s look more closely at three of these products.
In 2, above, we have a complete (c= b+1) triple, (3,4,5), and an incomplete (c ¹ b+1) triple, (15,8,17), with 3 as the common factor of their a-values and 9 = 32 the common factor of their product, (45,108,117). And in the incomplete triple, (15,8,17), c – b = 17 – 8 = 9, the common factor of the product, and its square root is the common factor of the a-values!
In 6, above, the complete triple (5,12,13) and the incomplete triple (35,12,37) have 5 as the common factor of their a-values and 25 = 52 as the common factor of their product, (175, 600, 625). And in the incomplete triple, (35,12,37), c – b = 37 – 12 = 25, the common factor of the product, and its square root is the common factor of the a-values!
In 7, above, the complete triple (7,24,25) and the incomplete triple (63,16,65), have 7 as the common factor of their a-values and 49 = 72 as the common factor of their product, (441,1960, 2009). And in the incomplete triple (63,16,65), c – b = 65 – 16 = 49, the common factor of the product, and its square root is the common factor of the a-values.
It seems that whenever we multiply a complete triple (a1, b1, c1) by an incomplete triple (a2, b2, c2) whose
a-values have a common factor f, equal to the square root of c2 – b2, then their product has a common factor of
f2 = c2 –b2. Let’s see if this is so.
Accordingly, we let (a1, b1, c1) be a complete triple and (a2, b2, c2) be an incomplete triple whose a-values have a common factor of f, where f2 = c2 –b2. We also let their product be (a, b, c). Then, there exist integers k1 and k2 such that a1 = fk1 and a2 = fk2. Since a1 and a2 are both odd, then f, k1, and k2 are also odd.
Then, (a1, b1, c1) x (a2, b2, c2) = (fk1, b1,c1) x (fk2, b2, c2)
= ( f2k1k2, b1c2 + c1b2, b1b2 + c1c2 ).
= (a, b, c).
where a = f2k1k2, which shows that f2 is a factor of a.
Since (a1, b1, c1) is a complete triple, c1 = b1 + 1. Then, a12 +b12 = c12 = (b1 + 1)2,
or a12 + b12 = b12 + 2b1 + 1,
and a12 = 2b1 + 1,
Solving for b1, we have b1 = (a12 – 1)/2 (5a)
= (f2k12 – 1)/2 (5b)
Since c1 = b1 + 1, we have c1 = (a12 – 1)/2 + 1
or c1 = (a12 + 1)/2 = (f2k12 + 1)/2 (6)
Then, b = b1c2 + c1b2, and substituting from (5b) and (6),
we get = (f2k12 – 1)/2 x c2 + (f2k12 + 1)/2 x b2,
= (f2k12c2 – c2)/2 + (f2k12b2 + b2)/2,
= f2k12c2/2 + f2k12b2/2 – (c2 – b2)/2.
And, since c2 – b2 = f2, we may replace the third term in the equation above by f2/2,
giving us b = f2k12c2/2 + f2k12b2/2 – f2/2 = f2( k12c2/2 + k12b2/2 – ½ ) = f2 [ (k12c2 – 1)/2 + k12b2/2 ].
Since k1 and c2 are both odd and b2 is even, then both terms in the brackets above are integers, which shows that f2 is a factor of b.
Now, c = b1b2 + c1c2, and substituting from (5b) and (6),
we get = (f2k12 – 1)/2 x b2 + (f2k12 + 1)/2 x c2,
= (f2k12c2 – b2)/2 + (f2k12b2 + c2)/2,
= f2 k12c2/2 + f2 k12b2/2 + (c2 –b2)/2.
And, since c2 – b2 = f2, we replace the third term in the equation above by f2/2, giving us
c = f2k12c2/2 + f2k12b2/2 + f2/2 = f2( k12c2/2 + k12b2/2 + ½ ) = f2 [ (k12c2 + 1)/2 + k12b2/2 ].
Since k1 and c2 are both odd and b2 is even, then both terms in the brackets above are integers, which shows that f2 is a factor of c.
Thus, we have proved that f2 is a common factor of (a, b, c); that is,
(a, b, c) = ( f2k1k2, f2(k12c2/2 + k12b2/2 – ½ ), f2(k12c2/2 + k12b2/2 + ½ ) ).
If we remove the factor f2 from the a, b, and c-values above, we get the “embedded” triple
(a3, b3, c3) = (k1k2, k12c2/2 + k12b2/2 – ½ , k12c2/2 + k12b2/2 + ½ ), for which
c3 = k12c2/2 + k12b2/2 + ½ = k12c2/2 + k12b2/2 + (- ½ + 1)
= (k12c2/2 + k12b2/2 - ½ ) + 1 = b3 + 1,
showing that the embedded triple (a3, b3, c3) is a complete triple. Since c3 = b3 + 1, then b3 and c3 are consecutive integers, and thus have no common factors, making (a3, b3, c3) a primitive triple. We have proved
Theorem 40
If (a1, b1, c1) is a complete triple, and (a2, b2, c2) is an incomplete triple, where a1 and a2 have
a common factor of f = Ö (c2 – b2), then (a1, b1, c1) x (a2, b2, c2) = (f2 a3, f2 b3, f2 c3 ),
which is not primitive, but the embedded triple (a3, b3, c3) is both primitive and complete.
___________________________________________________________________________
Example 3. Without actually carrying out the multiplication, determine if the product of (9, 40, 41) and (21, 20, 29)
is a primitive triple. If not a primitive triple, find its common factor and embedded triple. Since (9, 40, 41) is complete
and (21, 20, 29) is not, we can use Theorem 40. Here, c2 – b2 = 29 – 20 = 9, and its square root, 3, is a factor f of
the a-values of both triples. Thus, the product of the two triples will have a common factor of f2 = c2 – b2 = 9, and is thus not a primitive triple. To find the embedded triple, we must find the product of the two triples. Thus,
(9, 40, 41) x (21, 20, 29) = (189, 1980, 1989) = (9 x 21, 9 x 220, 9 x 221),
giving us the embedded triple (21, 220, 221), which is both primitive and complete.
Example 4. Factor (45, 108, 117) into a product of two triples. Since each term of (45, 108, 117) has a factor of 9,
we know by Theorem 40 that each of the a-values of its factors will have a common factor of 3. Now the factors of 45, the a-value of the given triple, are 45 and 1, 9 and 5, and 3 and 15, and the only factors which have 3 as a common factor are 3 and 15. Thus, we get
(3, b1, c1) x (15, b2, c2) = (45, 108, 117).
Since the only Pythagorean triple with an a-value of 3 is (3, 4, 5), we must have b1 = 4, and c1 = 5. Thus, we get (3, 4, 5) x (15, b2, c2) = (45, 108, 117). Multiplying the two factors out gives us
(45, 4c2 + 5b2, 4b2 + 5c2) = (45, 108, 117).
To find b2 and c2, we equate members of the two equal triples above, getting
4c2 + 5b2 = 108 5b2 + 4c2 = 108
or
4b2 + 5c2 = 117 4b2 + 5c2 = 117.
Solving the right-hand set of equations above by determinants, we get
108 4
117 5 540 – 468 72
b2 = ------------------- = ------------------ = ------ = 8,
5 4 25 – 16 9
4 5
5 108
4 117 585 – 432 153
c2 = ------------------ = ------------------- = --------- = 17.
5 4 25 – 16 9
4 5
So, b2 = 8, and c2 = 17, and we have factored (45,108,117) into (3,4,5) x (15, 8,17).
Now, Theorem 40 tells us what happens when we multiply a complete triple by an incomplete triple. What will happen if we multiply a complete triple by another complete triple? Let’s find out.
Let (a1, b1, c1) and (a2, b2, c2) be two complete triples. Then, c1 = b1 +1, c1 – b1 = 1, c2 = b2 + 1, and
b2 = c2 – 1. Will their product be a complete triple? Let’s see.
(a1, b1, c1) x (a2, b2, c2) = ( a1a2, b1c2 + c1b2, b1b2 + c1c2 ) = (a, b, c),
and to show that the product triple (a, b, c) is complete, we must show that c = b + 1.
Now, c = b1b2 + c1c2 , and by replacing b2 by c2 – 1 and c2 by b2 + 1 from above, we have
c = b1(c2 –1) + c1(b2+1) = b1c2 – b1 + c1b2 + c1 = b1c2 + c1b2 + (c1 – b1), and since c1 - b1 = 1,
= b1c2 + c1b2 + 1 = b + 1.
Thus, the product triple (a, b, c) = ( a1a2, b1c2 + c1b2, b1b2 + c1c2 ) is complete, and we have proved
Theorem 41
If A and B are two complete triples, then their product, A x B, is complete.
___________________________________________________________
2. Division of Pythagorean Triples
Let’s now see what we can discover about dividing two primitive Pythagorean triples. Since 6 ¸ 2 = 3 means
2 x 3 = 6, it seems only natural that
(a1, b1, c1) ¸ (a2, b2, c2) = (a3, b3, c3)
should mean that (a2, b2, c2) x (a3, b3, c3) = (a1, b1, c1). (7)
To find the values of the quotient triple, (a3, b3, c3), we multiply out the left-hand side of (7) above, getting
( a2a3, b2c3 + c2b3, b2b3 + c2c3 ) = (a1, b1, c1).
Equating the a, b, and c-values of the two triples above, we have
a2a3 = a1 or a3 = a1 / a2 (8)
b2c3 + c2b3 = b1 (9)
b2b3 + c2c3 = c1 (10)
Rearranging (9), and then solving (9) and (10) for b3 and c3 by determinants, we get
c2b3 + b2c3 = b1
b2b3 + c2c3 = c1
b1 b2
c1 c2 b1c2 – c1b2 b1c2 – c1b2 b1c2 – c1b2
b3 = ------------------ = -------------------- = -------------------- = ---------------------- (11)
c2 b2 c2c2 – b2b2 c22 – b22 a22
b2 c2
c2 b1
b2 c1 c2c1 – b2b1 c2c1 – b2b1 c2c1 – b2b1
c3 = ---------------- = --------------------- = -------------------- = ----------------------- (12)
c2 b2 c2c2 – b2b2 c22 – b22 a22
b2 c2
where c22 – b22 = a22, since a22 + b22 = c22. Substituting (8), (11), and (12) into (7a), we get
(a1, b1, c1) ¸ (a2, b2, c2) = (a1 /a2, (b1c2 – c1b2) / a22, (c1c2 – b1b2) / a22). (13)
_________________________________________________________________________
Now, if we wish the quotient triple (a3, b3, c3) to be a Pythagorean triple, then each of its members must be
a) positive and b) integers.
a) Since a1 and a2 are both positive, then a3 = a1/a2 will be positive, and since c1 > b1 and c2 > b2, then multiplying these two inequalities together, we get c1c2 > b1b2, or c1c2 – b1b2 > 0, so
c3 = (c1c2 – b1b2) / a22 will be positive, but looking at b3 = (b1c2 – c1b2) / a22, we see that
b1c2 – c1b2 must be positive for b3 to be positive. Thus, we must have
b1c2 – c1b2 > 0, b1c2 > c1b2, or b1/b2 > c1/c2. (14)
b) Since a3 = a1/a2, then a1/a2 must be an integer, say k, where k will be an odd positive integer since both
a1 and a2 are odd positive integers. Then,
a1/a2 = k, or a1 = ka2, for k an odd integer. (15)
However, even though we require that a1/a2 be an integer, that is not enough to ensure b3 and c3 will be integers. For example,
(39, 80, 89) ¸ (3, 4, 5) = ( 39/3, (80x5 – 89x4)/32, (89x5 – 80x4)/32 )
= (13, 44/9, 125/9),
which shows that b3 and c3 can be fractions even though a1/a2 = 39/3 = 13 is an integer. However, notice that (39, 80, 89) is not a complete triple, whereas (3, 4, 5) is. Perhaps if both triples were complete, then b3 and c3 would always be integers. Let’s see.
Division of Complete Triples
Let (a1, b1, c1) and (a2, b2, c2) be two complete primitive Pythagorean triples with a1 = ka2. Then,
c1 = b1 + 1, c2 = b2 + 1, and from (5a), b1 = (a12 – 1)/2, and b2 = (a22 – 1)/2.
b1c2 – c1b2 b1(b2 + 1) – (b1 + 1)b2 b1b2 + b1 – b1b2 – b2
Then, b3 = ------------------ = ------------------------------- = --------------------------------
a22 a22 a22
b1 – b2 (a12 – 1)/2 – (a22 – 1)/2 a12 – a22
= ------------------- = ------------------------------------- = ---------------------
a22 a22 2a22
k2a22 – a22 a22(k2 – 1) k2 – 1
= --------------------- = ----------------------- = -------------- (16)
2a22 2a22 2
From (15) above, k is odd, so k2 is odd, k2 – 1 is even, and thus (k2 – 1)/2 is an integer.
Thus, we have proved that b3 is an integer.
c1c2 – b1b2 (b1 + 1)(b2 + 1) – b1b2 b1b2 + b1 + b2 + 1 – b1b2
Next, c3 = -------------------- = ---------------------------------- = --------------------------------------
a22 a22 a22
b1 + b2 + 1 (a12 – 1)/2 + (a22 – 1)/2 + 1 a12 + a22
= -------------------- = ------------------------------------------ = --------------------
a22 a22 2a22
k2a22 + a22 a22(k2 + 1) k2 + 1
= -------------------- = ------------------- = ------------ (17)
2a22 2a22 2
From (15) above, k is odd, so k2 is odd, k2 + 1 is even, and thus (k2 + 1)/2 is an integer.
Thus, we have proved that c3 is an integer.
In addition, from (17), we have c3 = (k2 + 1)/2 = (k2 – 1 + 2)/2 = (k2 – 1)/2 + 2/2
= (k2 – 1)/2 + 1 = b3 + 1, from (16).
Thus, c3 = b3 + 1, and the quotient triple (a3, b3, c3) is complete! This gives us
Theorem 42
The quotient of two complete triples is complete.
_______________________________________
All of the above is summarized by the following.
Division of Complete Pythagorean triples (18)
If (a1, b1, c1) and (a2, b2, c2) are two complete Pythagorean triples with a1/a2 an integer, and b1 /b2 > c1 /c2,
then (a1, b1, c1) ¸ (a2, b2, c2) = ( a1/a2, (b1c2 – c1b2) / a22, (c1c2 – b1b2) / a22 ), a complete triple.
___________________________________________________________________________________________
Since for complete triples, c1 = b1 + 1 and c2 = b2 + 1, we can simplify (18) by writing
b1 / b2 > c1 / c2 as b1 / b2 > (b1 + 1) / (b2 + 1).
Then, since b1 and b2 are both positive, we may cross-multiply in the last inequality above, giving us
b1(b2 + 1) > b2(b1 + 1), b1b2 + b1 > b2b1 + b2, or b1 > b2.
Also, looking at the expressions for b3 and c3 in red above, we have
b3 = (b1 – b2) / a22, and c3 = (b1 + b2 + 1) / a22.
Thus, here is a simplified way to divide two complete triples.
Division of Complete Pythagorean triples (Simplified) (19)
If (a1, b1, c1) and (a2, b2, c2) are two complete Pythagorean triples, with a1 /a2 an integer, and b1 > b2,
then (a1, b1, c1) ¸ (a2, b2, c2) = (a1/a2, (b1 – b2) / a22, (b1 + b2 + 1) / a22 ), a complete triple.
______________________________________________________________________________________
Here are three examples of dividing complete triples.
1. (15, 112, 113) ¸ (5, 12, 13) = (15 / 5, (112 – 12) / 52, (112 + 12 + 1)/52 )
= (3, 100/25, 125/25) = (3, 4, 5).
(Note that b1 = 112 is greater than b2 = 12, and a1 / a2 is an integer.)
2. (9, 40, 41) ¸ (3, 4, 5) = (9 /3, (40 – 4) / 32, (40 + 4 + 1) / 32 )
= (3, 36/9, 45/9) = (3, 4, 5).
3. (35, 612, 613) ¸ (7, 24, 25) = (35/7, (612 – 24)/72, (612 + 24 + 1)/72)
= (5, 588/49, 637/49) = (5, 12, 13)
So, everything goes quite smoothly as long as we use only complete triples in our divisions, and the quotient of their a-values is an integer with b1 > b2. But what if all these restrictive conditions are not met? Then what happens? Let’s see. Using (13) above, we have
4. An incomplete triple divided by a complete triple.
(105, 608, 617) ¸ (7, 24, 25) = (105/7, (608x25 – 617x24)/ 72, (617x25 – 608x24)/ 72 )
= (105/7, 392/49, 833 /49) = (15, 8, 17), which is an incomplete Pythagorean triple.
Note that b1/b2 = 608/24 = 25.33 > c1 / c2 = 617/25 = 24.68.
5. Two complete triples, but a1/a2 not an integer.
(9, 40, 41) ¸ (5, 12, 13) = (9/5, (40x13 - 41x12)/52, (41x13 - 40x12)/52) = (9/5, 28/25, 53/25), which is NOT
a Pythagorean triple at all because its members are fractions. In fact, if we write the triple with all of its members
having the same denominator, we get (45/25, 28/25, 53/25), which shows that each member of the triple has a
common factor of 1/25. Amazingly enough, if we remove this common factor, we are left with the triple
(45, 28, 53) which is a primitive Pythagorean triple!
6. An incomplete triple divided by a complete triple.
(33, 56, 65) ¸ (3, 4, 5) = (33/3, (56x5 – 65x4)/ 32, (65x5 – 56x4)/ 32 ) = (33/3, 20/9, 101 /9)
= (11, 20/9, 101/9), which is NOT even a Pythagorean triple because two of its members are fractions. If we
rewrite this triple so that all of its members have a common denominator, then we get (99/9, 20/9, 101/9), showing
that each member of the triple has a common factor of 1/9. Removing this factor, we get the embedded triple
(99, 20, 101), which is an inverted (b < a). incomplete Pythagorean triple with b1/b2 = 56/14 = 4 > c1/c2
= 65/5 = 13.
If we look closely at the quotient triple, (a1 /a2, (b1c2 – c1b2) / a22, (c1c2 – b1b2) / a22), we notice that both the b- and c-values have denominators of a22. If we multiply the numerator and denominator of the a-value by a2, we get a quotient triple whose members each have the common factor of 1/a22; namely,
(a1a2 / a22, (b1c2 – c1b2) / a22, (c1c2 – b1b2) / a22). (20)
However, this triple is not a Pythagorean triple because of the common factor 1/a22. If we remove this common factor, we get the triple (a1a2, b1c2 – c1b2, c1c2 – b1b2). Let’s see if this “embedded” triple is a Pythagorean triple.
First, we shall require as before that b1/b2 > c1/c2, thus making b1c2 – c1b2 positive. Next, we must show that
(a1a2)2 + (b1c2 – c1b2)2 = (c1c2 – b1b2)2. (21)
Since (a1, b1, c1) and (a2, b2, c2) are Pythagorean triples, we know that
a12 + b12 = c12, or a12 = c12 – b12, (22)
and a22 + b22 = c22, or a22 = c22 – b22. (23)
Starting with the left-hand side of (21) above, we have
(a1a2)2 + (b1c2 – c1b2)2 = a12a22 + (b1c2 – c1b2)2
Substituting for a12 and a22 from (22) and (23) and expanding, we have
= (c12 - b12)(c22 - b22) + b12c22 – 2b1c2c1b2 + c12b22
= (c12c22 – c12b22 – b12c22 + b12b22) + b12c22 – 2b1c2c1b2 + c12b22
= c12c22 – 2c1c2b1b2 + b12b22
= (c1c2 – b1b2)2, which is the right-hand side of (21) above.
Thus, the embedded triple is a Pythagorean triple. This gives us
Division of Pythagorean triples
If (a1, b1, c1) and (a2, b2, c2) are two Pythagorean triples, with b1 / b2 > c1 / c2, then
(a1, b1, c1) ¸ (a2, b2, c2) = (a1 /a2, (b1c2 – c1b2) / a22, (c1c2 – b1b2) / a22).
= (a1a2 / a22, (b1c2 – c1b2) / a22, (c1c2 – b1b2) / a22),
where the embedded triple, (a1a2, b1c2 – c1b2, c1c2 – b1b2), is a Pythagorean triple.
_________________________________________________________________________
Example 7. If (21, 20, 29) is divided by (15, 8, 17), the quotient will not be a Pythagorean triple, since a1/a2 = 21/15 = 7/5, which is a fraction. From the division algorithm above, we find the embedded triple to be
(a1a2, b1c2 – c1b2, c1c2 – b1b2) = (21x15, 20x17 – 29x8, 29x17 – 20x8) = (315, 108, 333),
which is a Pythagorean triple although not primitive, since each of its members has a common factor of 9. Removing this factor, we get the primitive triple (35, 12, 37).
Products and Quotients of Complete and Incomplete Triples
In Theorem 41 above, we proved that the product of two complete triples is a complete triple, and in Theorem 42, we showed that the quotient of two complete triples is also a complete triple. Now, what about the product of two triples, one complete and one incomplete? Will their product be complete or incomplete?
To find out, let’s take a complete triple P and an incomplete triple Q, and form their product R. Then, PQ = R, and R is either complete or incomplete. Let’s assume that R is complete. Since PQ = R, we have Q = P / R, and
Q is the quotient of two complete triples P and R, so by Theorem 42, Q is complete. But this, of course, is not possible, since we know that Q is incomplete. Thus, our assumption that R is complete is false, and R must therefore be incomplete. This gives us
Theorem 43
If (a1, b1, c1) is a complete triple and (a2, b2, c2) is an incomplete triple,
then their product is incomplete.
________________________________________________________
Finally, let’s consider the product of two incomplete triples. Will it be complete or incomplete?
Let (a1, b1, c1) and (a2, b2, c2) be two incomplete triples. Then, c1 ¹ b1 + 1 and c2 ¹ b2 + 1. Their product
is P = ( a1a2, b1c2 + c1b2, b1b2 + c1c2 ), which is either complete or incomplete. Let’s assume P is complete. Then its c-value is one more than its b-value, or
b1b2 + c1c2 = b1c2 + c1b2 + 1,
b1b2 + c1c2 – b1c2 – c1b2 = 1,
c2(c1 – b1) – b2(c1 – b1) = 1,
and (c2 – b2)(c1 – b1) = 1.
Now in this last equation, b1, b2, c1, and c2 are all positive integers, with c2 > b2, and c1 > b1. Thus, c2 – b2 and c1 – b1 are both positive integers whose product is 1, and the only way this can happen is if
c2 – b2 = 1, and c1 – b1 = 1.
Then, c2 = b2 + 1, and c1 = b1 + 1, and thus (a1, b1, c1) and (a2, b2, c2) are both complete triples. But this is, of course, impossible since both triples are incomplete. So our assumption that their product P is complete is false, and P must therefore be incomplete, giving us
Theorem 44
If (a1, b1, c1) and (a2, b2, c2) are both incomplete triples,
then their product is incomplete.
_________________________________________________
Theorems 41, 42, 43, and 44 can be summarized as follows:
1) The product (or quotient) of two complete triples is complete.
2) The product of two incomplete triples is incomplete.
3) The product of a complete triple and an incomplete triple is incomplete.
or, The product of two triples is incomplete unless both triples are complete.
Interestingly enough, the quotient of two incomplete triples may be either complete or incomplete! For example, the division of the incomplete triple (75, 308, 317) by the incomplete triple (15, 8, 17) is (5, 12, 13), a complete triple, whereas the quotient of the incomplete triple (315, 572, 653) by (15, 8, 17) is (21, 20, 29), an incomplete triple. How very interesting!
3. Powers of Primitive Pythagorean Triples
Let’s turn now to finding various powers of primitive Pythagorean triples. We have
The square (a, b, c)2 = (a, b, c) x (a, b, c)
= (aa, bc + cb, bb + cc)
= (a2, 2bc, b2 + c2)
Example: (15, 8, 17)2 = (152, 2(8)(17), 82 + 172) = (225, 272, 353)
The cube (a, b, c)3 = (a, b, c)2 x (a, b, c)
= (a2, 2bc, b2 + c2) x (a, b, c)
= (a2a, 2bcc + (b2 + c2)b, 2bcb + (b2 + c2)c)
= (a3, 2bc2 + b3 + bc2, 2b2c + b2c + c3)
= (a3, b3 + 3bc2, c3 + 3b2c)
Example: (3, 4, 5)3 = ( 33, 43 + 3(4)52, 53 + 3(42)5 ) = (27, 364, 365)
4th Power (a, b, c)4 = (a, b, c)3 x (a, b, c)
= (a3, b3 + 3bc2, c3 + 3b2c) x (a, b, c)
= ( a3a, (b3 + 3bc2)c + (c3 + 3b2c)b, (b3 + 3bc2)b + (c3 + 3b2c)c )
= (a4, b3c + 3bc3 + c3b + 3b3c, b4 + 3b2c2 + c4 + 3b2c2 )
= (a4, 4b3c + 4bc3, b4 + c4 + 6b2c2)
Example: (3, 4, 5)4 = ( 34, 4(43)5 + 4(4)53, 44 + 54 + 6(42)52 ) = (81, 3280, 3281)
5th Power (a, b, c)5 = (a, b, c)4 x (a, b, c)
= (a4, 4b3c + 4bc3, b4 + c4 + 6b2c2) x (a, b, c)
= ( a4a, (4b3c + 4bc3)c + (b4 + c4 + 6b2c2)b, (4b3c + 4bc3)b + (b4 + c4 + 6b2c2)c )
= ( a5, 4b3c2 + 4bc4 + b5 + bc4 + 6b3c2, 4b4c + 4b2c3 + b4c + c5 + 6b2c3 )
= (a5, b5 + 10b3c2 + 5bc4, c5 + 5b4c + 10b2c3 )
Example: (3, 4, 5)5 = ( 35, 45 + 10(43)52 + 5(4)54, 55 + 5(44)5 + 10(42)53 )
= ( 243, 1024 + 16000 + 12500, 3125 + 6400 + 20000 ) = (243, 29524, 29525)
Note that to find a power of (a, b, c), we have to calculate all of its preceding powers. As we have just seen, to
find the value of (a, b, c)5, we had to calculate its 4 preceding powers, which resulted in many complicated expressions. But are there any patterns in these expressions? Let’s try to find them!
(a, b, c)1 = (a, b, c)
(a, b, c)2 = (a2, 2bc, b2 + c2)
(a, b, c)3 = (a3, b3 + 3bc2, c3 + 3b2c)
(a, b, c)4 = (a4, 4b3c + 4bc3, b4 + c4 + 6b2c2)
(a, b, c)5 = (a5, b5 + 10b3c2 + 5bc4, c5 + 5b4c + 10b2c3 )
First of all, we see that the a-values are simply powers of a raised to the power of the triple. Thus, the a-value of the 4th triple is a4, and so the a-value of the nth triple will be an. Also, if we look carefully, we can see that c raised to the power of the triple appears in the c-value of each triple. Thus, c2 is a part of the c-value of the 2nd triple, c3 is a part of the c-value of the 3rd triple, c4 is a part of the c-value of the 4th, etc. Let’s rearrange the triples above so that the powers of c are written as the last term in each c-value.
(a, b, c)1 = (a, b, c)
(a, b, c)2 = (a2, 2bc, b2 + c2)
(a, b, c)3 = (a3, b3 + 3bc2, 3b2c + c3)
(a, b, c)4 = (a4, 4b3c + 4bc3, b4 + 6b2c2 + c4)
(a, b, c)5 = (a5, b5 + 10b3c2 + 5bc4, 5b4c + 10b2c3 + c5)
Yes, that looks a bit better, but it still seems very complicated! Are there other patterns?
Well, b2 appears as a part of a term in the c-values of all the triples after the first. And
b is in the b-value of the 1st triple,
b2 is in the c-value of the 2nd triple,
b3 is in the b-value of the 3rd triple,
b4 is in the c-value of the 4th triple,
b5 is in the b-value of the 5th triple.
It appears that these powers of b alternate between the b-values and the c-values of the triples. Now this pattern is somewhat interesting, but not sufficient for us to discover a pattern that would allow us to write down any power of (a, b, c) directly without first having to calculate all of its preceding powers as done in the lists above.
Now, we have been very fortunate in discovering many, many patterns in the primitive right triangles and Pythagorean triples. Surely, we can find a key pattern here. Let’s continue looking!
(a, b, c)1 = (a, b, c)
(a, b, c)2 = (a2, 2bc, b2 + c2)
(a, b, c)3 = (a3, b3 + 3bc2, 3b2c + c3)
(a, b, c)4 = (a4, 4b3c + 4bc3, b4 + 6b2c2 + c4)
(a, b, c)5 = (a5, b5 + 10b3c2 + 5bc4, 5b4c + 10b2c3 + c5)
Well, there is an interesting pattern in the 2nd triple above. Its b and c values, 2bc and b2 + c2, when added together, give us b2 + 2bc + c2 = (b + c)2, a perfect square. Now, this is very nice! Is this pattern in the other power triples? Let’s see!
In the 3rd triple, its b and c values of b3 + 3bc2 and 3b2c + c3, when added together, give us
b3 + 3bc2 + 3b2c + c3, or b3 + 3b2c + 3b2c + c3 = (b + c)3.
This is simply amazing! Let’s try the 4th triple!
In the 4th triple, its b and c values of 4b3c + 4bc3 and b4 + 6b2c2 + c4, when added together, give us
4b3c + 4bc3 + b4 + 6b2c2 + c4, or b4 + 4b3c + 6b2c2 + 4bc3 + c4,
and using the binomial theorem, we find this is nothing more nor less than (b + c)4.
Hooray! We’ve discovered the key to this pattern. It appears that for any triple (a, b, c) raised to a power n, the sum of its b and c values is equal to (b + c)n. If so, then the sum of the b- and c-values of the 5th triple above will be (b + c)5. Let’s see if it is!
In the 5th triple, the b- and c-values of b5 + 10b3c2 + 5bc4 and 5b4c + 10b2c3 + c5, when added together, give us
b5 + 10b3c2 + 5bc4 + 5b4c + 10b2c3 + c5,
which, when rearranged, is b5 + 5b4c + 10b3c2 + 10b2c3 + 5bc4 + c5, and this expression,
by the binomial theorem, does equal (b + c)5.
Great! Our prediction is correct, and we have discovered a most beautiful pattern for finding the powers of primitive Pythagorean triples and, to our surprise, it is linked to the binomial theorem!
Once again, let’s list the powers of (a, b, c), and this time, we shall also list the appropriate powers of b + c below them. Then, let’s place the letters B and C beneath each term to indicate whether that term belongs either to the b-value (B) or the c-value (C) of the power, as appropriate. The results of this are shown below.
(Note that, for example, in the 3rd triple, the triple for (a, b, c)3 is listed first, and then beneath it is listed the binomial expansion of (b + c)3. The letter B is placed underneath the b3 because b3 is a part of the b-value
b3 + 3bc2 of (a, b, c)3. The letter C is placed underneath the 3b2c to indicate that it is a part of the c-value
3b2c + c3 of (a, b, c)3. In like manner, 3bc2 has a B beneath it because it is part of the b-value of (a, b, c)3, and c3 has a C beneath it because it is a part of the c-value of (a, b, c)3.)
1. (a, b, c)1 = (a, b, c)
(b + c)1 = b + c
B C
2. (a, b, c)2 = (a2, 2bc, b2 + c2)
(b + c)2 = b2 + 2bc + c2
C B C
3. (a, b, c)3 = (a3, b3 + 3bc2 , 3b2c + c3)
(b + c)3 = b3 + 3b2c + 3bc2 + c3
B C B C
4. (a, b, c)4 = (a4, 4b3c + 4bc3, b4 + 6b2c2 + c4)
(b + c)4 = b4 + 4b3c + 6b2c2 + 4bc3 + c4
C B C B C
5. (a, b, c)5 = (a5, b5 + 10b3c2 + 5bc4, 5b4c + 10b2c3 + c5)
(b + c)5 = b5 + 5b4c + 10b3c2 + 10b2c3 + 5bc4 + c5
B C B C B C
Now notice what we have found in this list. Amazingly, the letters alternate between B and C, or C and B, for each of the powers of (a, b, c)! This means that the terms in the binomial expansion associated with a power of a triple alternate between the b and c values of the power of the triple. And if the power of the triple is odd, as in (a, b, c3, then the alternation starts with a B, and if the power of the triple is even, as in (a, b, c)4, the alternation starts with a C. How very interesting! But that is not all.
Take a closer look at the terms in the list with B’s and C’s underneath them. Notice that each term with a B underneath it contains an odd power of b, whereas each term with a C underneath it contains an even power of b. This is really nice. Let’s look at an example.
Example 1. Find (a, b, c)6 directly, and then check your work by calculating it from (a, b, c)5. We start
with (a, b, c)6 = (a6, ________ , ________ ), and to find out what goes in the blanks for the b and c values,
we will expand (b + c)6 by the binomial theorem and then place alternating B’s and C’s underneath each resulting term. Since the power of the triple is even (6), we will start the alternation with a C. We get
(b + c) 6 = b6 + 6b5c + 15b4c2 + 20b3c3 + 15b2c4 + 6bc5 + c5.
C B C B C B C
Now the sum of the terms with the B’s under them is 6b5c + 20b3c3 + 6bc5, and this will be the b-value of
(a, b, c)6. Note that all the powers of b are odd.
The sum of the terms with the C’s under them is b6 + 15b4c2 + 15b2c4 + c5, and this will be the c-value for
(a, b, c)6. Note that all the powers of b are even. (We say c5 has an even power of b since c5 = b0c5, and 0 is even.)
Thus, (a, b, c)6 = (a6, 6b5c + 20b3c3 + 6bc5, b6 + 15b4c2 + 15b2c4 + c5 ). (1)
To be sure that (1) is correct, we will find (a, b, c)6 by multiplying (a, b, c)5 by (a, b, c). Thus,
(a, b, c)6 = (a, b, c)5 x (a, b, c)
= (a5, b5 + 10b3c2 + 5bc4, 5b4c + 10b2c3 + c5) x (a, b, c)
= ( a6, (b5+10b3c2+5bc4)c + (5b4c+10b2c3+c5)b, (b5+10b3c2+5bc4)b + (5b4c+10b2c3+ c5)c )
= ( a6, b5c + 10b3c3 + 5bc5 + 5b5c + 10b3c3 + bc5, b6 + 10b4c2 + 5b2c4 + 5b4c2 + 10b2c4 + c6 )
= ( a6, 6b5c + 20b3c3 + 6bc5, b6 + 15b4c2 + 15b2c4 + c6 ), which is identical to (1) above.
Thus, our procedure is correct.
Example 2. Find (a, b, c)3 directly. We first use the binomial theorem to expand (b + c)3. Thus,
(b + c)3 = b3 + 3b2c + 3bc2 + c3.
Then, the sum of those terms with odd powers of b; namely, b3 and 3bc2, will be the b-value of our power, and the sum of those terms with even powers of b; namely, 3b2c and c3, will be the c-value. Thus,
(a, b, c)3 = (a3, b3 + 3bc2, 3b2c + c3 ),
as is confirmed by the 3rd triple in our list above.
_______________________________________________________________________________
In general, the nth power of the triple (a, b, c) is a Pythagorean triple whose
a-value is an,
b-value is the sum of those terms with odd powers of b in the expansion of (b + c)n,
and c-value is the sum of those terms with even powers of b in the expansion of (b + c)n.
_______________________________________________________________________________
To prove these statements, we would use mathematical induction.
Example 3. An easy way to find, say (a, b, c)5, is to think of it as [ a5 , (b + c)5 ]. Then, expanding
(b + c)5 by the Binomial Theorem, we get [ a5 , b5 + 5b4c + 10b3c2 + 10b2c3 + 5bc4 + c5 ].
Now, all we have to do is separate the terms of this expansion, putting those with odd powers of b on the left and those terms with even powers of b on the right, giving us
[ a5 , b5 + 10b3c2 + 5bc4 5b4c + 10b2c3 + c5 ].
Then, we simply change the brackets to parentheses, put a comma between the separated terms, and we get
( a5 , b5 + 10b3c2 + 5bc4 , 5b4c + 10b2c3 + c5 ). What fun!
Now, let’s take one more look at our list of powers. What can we see?
(a, b, c)1 = (a, b, c)
(a, b, c)2 = (a2, 2bc, b2 + c2)
(a, b, c)3 = (a3, b3 + 3bc2, 3b2c + c3)
(a, b, c)4 = (a4, 4b3c + 4bc3, b4 + 6b2c2 + c4)
(a, b, c)5 = (a5, b5 + 10b3c2 + 5bc4, 5b4c + 10b2c3 + c5)
Well first, for any triple raised to an odd power, we see that the number of terms in its b-value (nb) equals the number of terms in its c-value (nc), whereas for one which is raised to an even power, the number of terms in its
c-value is one more than the number of terms in its b-value. For example, in the expansion of (a, b, c)4, there are
2 terms in its b-value and 3 terms in its c-value.
Second, can we predict how many terms will be in the b- and c-values of any triple raised to the nth power?
Well, if we let n equal the power of a triple (a, b, c), nb equal the number of terms in its b-value, and nc the number of terms in its c-value, we get the following tables for the odd and even powers of the triple.
Odd powers of n Even powers of n
n + 1 n nb nc 2nc n nb nc 2nb
---------------------------------------- ---------------------------------
2 1 1 1 2 2 1 2 2
4 3 2 2 4 4 2 3 4
6 5 3 3 6 6 3 4 6
nb = nc nb + 1 = nc
n + 1 = 2nc n = 2nb
Comparing the various columns of these tables, we see that for
Odd powers of n Even powers of n
nc = nb nc = nb + 1,
2nc = n + 1 2nb = n,
or nc = (n+1)/2 nb = n/2
Putting all of this together, we get
Theorem 45
The nth power, (a, b, c)n, of the Pythagorean triple (a, b, c) is (an, B, C), where
B = the sum of all the terms with odd powers of b in (b + c)n, and
C = the sum of all the terms with even powers of b in (b + c)n.
a) If n is odd, then B and C each have (n+1)/2 terms. Thus, B and C have the same number of terms.
b) If n is even, then B has n/2 terms, and C has n/2 + 1 terms. Thus, C has one more term than B.
____________________________________________________________________________________
Example 4. a) Find the number of terms in the a, b, and c values of (a, b, c)10 without actually calculating its power, and b) calculate the power to verify your answer.
a) There will be only one term in the a-value of (a, b, c)10; namely, a10. Since n = 10, an even number, Theorem 45 tells us that its b-value will have 10/2 = 5 terms, and its c-value one more; namely, 6 terms.
b) (a, b, c)10 → [ a10, (b + c)10 ]. First, we use the binomial theorem to calculate (b + c)10
= b10 + 10b9c + 45b8c2 + 120b7c3 + 210b6c4 + 252b5c5 + 210b4c6 + 120b3c7 + 45b2c8 + 10bc9 + c10.
Since the sum of the terms with the odd powers of b is the b-value, the sum of the rest of the terms will be the
c-value, and we have the following for (a, b, c)10.
1) Its a-value = a10 (one term)
2) Its b-value = 10b9c + 120b7c3 + 252b5c5 + 120b3c7 + 10bc9 (5 terms)
3) Its c-value = b10 + 45b8c2 + 210b6c4 + 210b4c6 + 45b2c8 + c10 (6 terms).
These values verify our answers in part a), and we have (a, b, c)10 =
(a10, 10b9c + 120b7c3 + 252b5c5 + 120b3c7 + 10bc9, b10 + 45b8c2 + 210b6c4 + 210b4c6 + 45b2c8 + c10 ).
4. The Square Root of Primitive Pythagorean Triples
Let’s now see if we can find square roots of primitive Pythagorean triples, (a, b, c).
_______
If Ö (a, b, c) = (a1, b1, c1), then (a, b, c) = (a1, b1, c1)2 = (a1, b1, c1) x (a1, b1, c1),
or (a, b, c) = (a1a1, b1c1+c1b1, b1b1 + c1c1) = (a12, 2b1c1, b12 + c12).
Equating the members of each triple in the equation above, we get
__
a = a12, or a1 = Ö a (1)
b = 2b1c1, (2)
c = b12 + c12 (3)
Adding (3) and (2), we get c + b = b12 + c12 + 2b1c1 = (c1 + b1)2. (4a)
Subtracting (2) from (3), we get c – b = b12 + c12 – 2b1c1 = (c1 – b1)2. (4b)
_____
From (4a), we have c1 + b1 = Ö c + b , (5a)
_____
and from (4b), c1 – b1 = Ö c – b . (5b)
_____ _____
Adding (5a) and (5b), we get 2c1 = Ö c + b + Ö c – b,
_____ _____
or c1 = ( Ö c + b + Ö c – b ) / 2. (6)
_____ _____
Subtracting (5b) from (5a), we get 2b1 = Ö c + b – Ö c – b,
____ _____
or b1 = ( Ö c + b – Ö c – b ) / 2. (7)
Then, substituting the values of a1, b1, and c1 from (1), (7), and (6), into
_______
Ö (a, b, c) = (a1, b1, c1), we have
Theorem 46
The square root of a Pythagorean triple (a, b, c) is given by
_______ _ ____ _____ ____ _____
Ö (a, b, c) = ( Öa, (Ö c + b – Ö c – b ) / 2, (Ö c + b + Ö c – b ) / 2 ).
___________________________________________________________
_____________ ___________________
Example 5. Find a) Ö (225, 272, 353) and b) Ö (225, 25312, 25313). (These two triples have the same
a-values, but different b and c-values. Will their square roots be the same or different?)
Using Theorem 46, we have
_____________ ___ _____ ___ _________ _________ ________
a) Ö (225, 272, 353) = (Ö225, (Ö 353 + 272 – Ö 353 – 272 ) / 2, (Ö 353 + 272 + Ö 353 – 272 ) / 2 )
___ ____ ___ ____ __ ___ ____ __ ____ __
= (Ö225, (Ö 625 – Ö 81 ) / 2, (Ö 625 + Ö81 ) / 2 ) = (Ö225, (Ö 625 – Ö 81 ) / 2, (Ö 625 + Ö81 ) / 2 )
= (15, (25 – 9) / 2, (25+9) / 2 ) = (15, 8, 17).
__________________
b) To find Ö (225, 25312, 25313), let’s first find c + b = 25313 + 25312 = 50625, and c – b =
25313 – 25312 = 1. Then,
_________________ ____ ______ __ ______ _
Ö (225, 25312, 25313) = (Ö 225, (Ö 50625 – Ö 1 ) / 2, (Ö 50625 + Ö1 ) / 2 )
= (15, (225 – 1) / 2, (225+1) / 2 ) = (15, 112, 113), which is a different answer from the one in a) above.
Since the two triples were different (although their a-values were the same), we got different square roots, which is nice!
5. Two New Pythagorean Triples (1,0,1) and (0,0,0)
We know that a number (other than zero) divided by itself is always 1. What do you think will happen if we divide a primitive Pythagorean triple by itself? Well, let’s see. If (a, b, c) is a primitive Pythagorean triple, then
(a, b, c) ¸ (a, b, c) = (a/a, (bc – cb) / (c2 – b2), (c2 – b2) / (c2 – b2) )
= (1, 0, 1).
This is very surprising! We get a new triple, one which we have never seen before! Is it a Pythagorean triple? Is it primitive?
Well, it certainly is primitive, since its members have no common factors (other than 1), and it satisfies the Pythagorean Theorem, a2 + b2 = c2, since 12 + 02 = 12, but it is NOT a Pythagorean triple, since not all of its members are positive integers (b = 0). However, let’s expand our definition of a Pythagorean triple to allow its members to be either positive integers or zero. Then, we can say that
(1, 0, 1) is a primitive Pythagorean triple.
Now in (1, 0, 1), c = 1 and b = 0, so c = b +1, and (1, 0, 1) is a complete triple. Also, the difference between
a and b is 1 – 0 = 1, so (1, 0, 1) is a unit triple. And since a = 1 is greater than b = 0, it is also an inverted triple. However, it is not a proper triple (this is not surprising!), since its a-value of 1 is not divisible by 3, and its c-value of 1 is not divisible by 5, although its b-value of 0 is divisible by 4. Thus,
(1, 0, 1) is a complete, inverted, unit triple.
Now, let’s multiply (1, 0, 1) by itself and see what happens. Accordingly, we have
(1, 0, 1) x (1, 0, 1) = (1 x 1 , 0 x 1 + 1 x 0 , 0 x 0 + 1 x 1) = (1, 0, 1),
and nothing is changed! In multiplying (1, 0, 1) by itself, we find that (1, 0, 1) is left unchanged; that is, its identity is preserved. Let’s look at the properties of (1, 0, 1) more closely.
What if we multiply any triple (a, b, c) by (1, 0, 1)? Will (a, b, c) be changed? Well,
(a, b, c) x (1, 0, 1) = (a x 1 , b x 1 + c x 0 , b x 0 + c x 1) = (a, b, c),
and the triple (a, b, c) is unchanged! Its identity is preserved.
What if we divide any triple (a, b, c) by (1, 0, 1)? Will (a, b, c) be changed? Well,
(a, b, c) ¸ (1, 0, 1) = (a/1 , (b x 1 – c x 0) / (12 – 02) , (c x 1 – b x 0) / (12 – 02) ) = (a, b, c),
and the triple (a, b, c) is unchanged!
Apparently, (1, 0, 1) acts on Pythagorean triples just like the number 1 acts on real numbers under multiplication; namely, it leaves them unchanged. Because of this, we shall say that
1 = (1, 0, 1) is the unitary triple for Pythagorean triples.
Now 1 raised to any integral power n is 1, so we would expect that (1, 0, 1)n would equal (1, 0, 1). Let’s see if it does.
From Theorem 45, we know that (a, b, c)n is that triple whose a-value is an, and whose b-value is the sum of the odd powers of b in (b + c)n, and whose c-value is the sum of the even powers of b in (b + c)n.
For (1, 0, 1)n, the a-value will be 1n = 1.
To find the b- and c-values, we must find (b + c)n = (0 + 1)n, which is 1n = 1 = b0. Then the b-value
will be 0 since there are no odd powers of b in (0 + 1)n = 1, and the c-value will be 1, since the sum of the even powers of b in (0 + 1)n is b0 = 1. Thus, (1, 0, 1)n = (1, 0, 1).
_______
Example 1. Find Ö (1, 0, 1) . By Theorem 46,
_______ __ _____ ______ _____ __
Ö (1. 0, 1) = ( Ö 1, (Ö 1 + 0 – Ö 1 – 0 ) / 2, (Ö 1 + 0 + Ö 1 – 0 ) / 2 ) = (1, 0, 1).
This example further confirms that the unitary triple (1, 0, 1) behaves just like the integer 1 with respect to multiplication, division, powers and square roots.
Multiplication by the triple (k, 0, k)
Now if multiplication by (1, 0, 1) leaves (a, b, c) unchanged, what would the multiplication of (a, b, c) by
(2, 0, 2), or (3, 0, 3), or (k, 0, k), k an integer, give us? Let’s see.
Now, (2, 0, 2) x (a, b, c) = (2a, 0 x c + 2b, 0 x b + 2c) = (2a, 2b, 2c),
and we have doubled each member of (a, b, c).
(3, 0, 3) x (a, b, c) = (3a, 0 x c + 3b, 0 x b + 3c) = (3a, 3b, 3c),
and we have tripled each member of (a, b, c).
Finally, (k, 0, k) x (a, b, c) = (ka, 0 x c + kb, 0 x b + kc) = (ka, kb, kc),
and we have multiplied each member of (a, b, c) by the positive integer k.
Apparently, (k, 0, k) acts on Pythagorean triples just like the number k acts on real numbers under multiplication; namely, it multiplies them by k. Because of this, we shall say that
K = (k, 0, k) is the k-multiplier triple for Pythagorean triples;
that is, for A = (a, b, c), KA = (k, 0, k) x (a, b, c) = ( ka, kb, kc ).
Thus, multiplying any primitive Pythagorean triple by (k, 0, k) simply introduces k into the triple as a common factor of its members. Unfortunately, the resulting triple will not be primitive (unless k = 1), but then, the triples
(k, 0, k) for k a positive integer ¹ 1, are not primitive either.
Now, what if k = 0 in (k, 0, k)? Then, multiplying any triple by (k, 0, k) with k = 0 will introduce 0 as a common factor in each of its members, resulting in (0 x a, 0 x b, 0 x c) = (0, 0, 0), a new triple. Could this triple act like the integer zero? If so, then we would expect that (a, b, c) x (0, 0, 0) would equal (0, 0, 0), just as 7 x 0 = 0, or 12 x 0 = 0 for integers. Let’s see if it does. Now,
(a, b, c) x (0, 0, 0) = (a x 0, b x 0 + c x 0, b x 0 + c x 0) = (0, 0, 0),
and our prediction is correct, and we shall say that
O = (0, 0, 0) is the zero triple for Pythagorean triples.
In conclusion, we have found that
1 = (1, 0, 1), the unitary triple, acts like the integer 1 for multiplication; that is,
A x 1 = A x (1, 0, 1) = A, for any Pythagorean triple A, and
O = (0, 0, 0), the zero triple, acts like the integer 0 for multiplication; that is,
A x O = A x (0, 0, 0) = O, for any Pythagorean triple A. and
K = (k, 0, k), the k-multiplier triple, acts like the integer k for multiplication; that is,
K x A = (k, 0, k) x A = (ka, kb, kc), for any Pythagorean triple A = (a, b, c).
_______________________________________________________________________
Example 2. 1 x (15, 8, 17) = (1, 0, 1) x (15, 8, 17) = (15, 8, 17)
O x (15, 8, 17) = (0, 0, 0) x (15, 8, 17) = (0, 0, 0)
4 x (15, 8, 17) = (4, 0, 4) x (15, 8, 17) = (4x15, 4x8, 4x17) = (60, 32, 68)
6. Adding primitive Pythagorean triples
To add two primitive Pythagorean triples, it is natural to simply add their a-values together. Thus,
(7, 24, 25) + (15, 8, 17) would equal (22, __ , __ ).
But this gives us a triple with an even a-value of 22, which is not possible, since a must always be odd. In fact, whenever we add the a-values of any two triples together, we will get an even integer, since both a-values of the two triples are odd, and hence their sum will be even. So this method of addition does not work.
Now in section 5 above, we found that (1, 0, 1) acted like the number 1 for multiplication. If (1, 0, 1) also acts like the number 1 for addition, and if we have ordered our triples in terms of their increasing a-values, we would expect that adding (1, 0, 1) to any triple would give us the next higher triple in order. For example, if we were to add
(1, 0, 1) to (5, 12, 13), we should get (7, 24, 25), the next higher triple in order after (5, 12, 13). But, to get
(7, 24, 25), we must add 1 to the sum of the two a-values of (1, 0, 1) and (5, 12, 13) to get this desired sum. Thus, the sum of (5,12,13) and (1,0,1) will be
(5 + 1 + 1, __ , __ ) = (7, 24, 25 ), and in general,
(a, b, c) + (1, 0, 1) will equal (a + 1 + 1, __ , __ ) = (a + 2, __ , __ ),
which is the next triple after (a, b, c) when the triples are ordered in terms of their increasing a-values. So, let’s say that
the a-value of the sum of two triples is one more than the sum of their a-values,
and the b and c values will be those which are associated with the resulting a-value. Then,
a) (7, 24, 25) + (3, 4, 5) will equal (7+3+1, __ , __ ) = (11, 60, 61), and
b) (13, 84, 85) + (5, 12, 13) = (13+5+1, 180, 181) = (19, 180, 181).
Note that we have simply put in the correct b and c values which correspond to the computed a-value. But what if that a-value belongs to more than one triple?
For example, what about the sum of (5, 12, 13) and (9, 40, 41)? It will be (5+9+1, ? , ? ) = (15, ?, ?), but what are we to put in for the b and c values?
There are two triples which have 15 as their a-value; namely, (15, 8, 17) and (15, 112, 113). Which one of these should we pick?
Since (5, 12, 13) and (9, 40, 41) are both complete, let’s pick (15,112,113) as their sum since it is also complete.
Next, let’s consider A = (15, 8, 17), B = (15, 112, 113), and C = (7, 24, 25). Since A ¹ B, we would expect the sum of A and C to be different from the sum of B and C. But, since the a-values of A and B are the same, we get
A + C = (15,8,17) + (7,24,25) = (15+7+1, __ , __ ) = (23,264,265), (1)
and B + C = (15,112,113) + (7,24,25) = (15+7+1, __ , __ ) = (23,264,265), (2)
and we see that A + C = B + C, even though A ¹ B. This is not good!
Now, in (1) above, we added an incomplete and a complete triple together and got a complete triple as their sum, whereas in (2) above, the triples were both complete, and their sum was also complete.
To be consistent, let’s agree to add only those triples which are complete.
Notice that in our rule of addition, we look only at the a-values of the two triples to be added in determining the
a-value of their sum, and then we determine the b- and c- values of this sum based on this resulting a-value. Since we have agreed to restrict our addition to complete triples only, this makes it especially nice, since any complete triple is completely determined by its a-value alone. Let’s see why.
In a complete triple (a, b, c), c = b + 1.
Then, since a2 + b2 = c2,
we have a2 + b2 = (b+1)2,
a2 + b 2 = b2 + 2b + 1,
and a2 = 2b + 1. (3)
Solving (3) for b, we get b = (a2 – 1)/2,
giving us
Theorem 47
If (a, b, c) is complete, then b = (a2 – 1)/2, and c = b + 1.
__________________________________________________
which is a restatement of Theorem 10 in Part 1.
Example 1. Find the complete triple with a = 7. From Theorem 47, b = (72 – 1)/2 = (49 – 1)/2 = 24, and c = b + 1 = 24 + 1 = 25. Thus, the complete triple is (7, 24, 25).
Example 2. Find the sum of (7, 24, 25) and (13, 84, 85). Since both of these triples are complete, the a-value of their sum will be one more than the sum of their a-values; namely, 7 + 13 + 1 = 21. Then, by Theorem 47,
b = (212 – 1)/2 = (441 - 1)/2 = 220, and c = b + 1 = 221. So, their sum is (21, 220, 221).
Combining our discussion above with Theorem 47, we get
Adding Complete Triples (1st method)
If (a1, b1, c1) and (a2, b2, c2) are complete Pythagorean triples, then
(a1, b1, c1) + (a2, b2, c2) = (a, b, c), where
a = a1 + a2 + 1, b = (a2 – 1)/2, and c = b + 1.
_________________________________________________________
From the above, we have
a = a1 + a2 + 1,
b = (a2 – 1)/2 = [(a1 + a2 + 1)2 – 1] / 2
= [(a12 + a22 + 1 + 2a1a2 + 2a1 + 2a2) – 1] / 2
= ( a12 + a22 + 2a1a2 + 2a1 + 2a2 ) / 2, and using (3) above,
we have = [(2b1 + 1) + (2b2 + 1) + 2a1a2 + 2a1 + 2a2 ] / 2
= b1 + b2 + 1 + a1 + a1a2 + a2,
and c = b + 1
= (b1 + b2 + 1 + a1 + a1a2 + a2) + 1
= (c1 – 1) + (c2 – 1) + a1 + a1a2 + a2 + 2
= c1 + c2 + a1 + a1a2 + a2.
Thus, we get
Adding Complete Triples (2nd method)
If (a1, b1, c1) and (a2, b2, c2) are complete Pythagorean triples, then
(a1, b1, c1) + (a2, b2, c2) = (a1 + a2 + 1, b1 + b2 + 1 + d, c1 + c2 + d),
where d = a1 + a1a2 + a2.
_______________________________________________________________
a most complicated expression to say the least! But there ARE patterns in it.
First, to add two triples, we add their a-values, b-values, and c-values, getting
(a1 + a2 + . . . , b1 + b2 + . . . , c1 + c2 + . . . ).
Next, we add 1 to the a- and b-values, giving us
( a1 + a2 + 1 + . . . , b1 + b2 + 1 + . . . , c1 + c2 + . . . ).
Lastly, we add d = a1 + a1a2 + a2 to the b and c values, getting
(a1 + a2 + 1, b1 + b2 + 1+ (a1 + a1a2 + a2) , c1 + c2 + (a1 + a1a2 + a2)).
Example 3. Find the sum of (5, 12, 13) and (7, 24, 25) using the 2nd method above.
First, let’s calculate d = a1 + a1a2 + a2 = 5 + 5(7) + 7 = 47. Then, by the 2nd method,
(5, 12, 13) + (7, 24, 25) = ( 5+7+1, 12+24+1 + d, 13+25 + d )
= (13, 37 + d, 38 + d ) = (13, 37 + 47, 38 + 47)
= (13, 84, 85).
Now, let’s find the sum of any non-zero triple (a1, b1, c1) and the zero triple, O = (0,0,0)
Since O = (0,0,0) is the only Pythagorean triple whose a-value is even, then, when we add O to any non-zero triple, we do not need to increase the sum of the a-values by 1 to get an odd integer for this a-value! We simply add the two a-values together, and then find the b and c values using the 1st method of addition. So, we have
(a1, b1, c1) + (0, 0, 0) = (a, b, c),
where a = a1 + a2 = a1 + 0 = a1,
b = (a2 – 1)/2 = (a12 – 1)/2, and, since a12 = 2b1 + 1 from (3) above, we have
= (2b1 + 1 – 1)/2 = b1,
and c = b + 1 = b1 + 1 = c1.
Thus, (a1, b1, c1) + (0, 0, 0) = (a1, b1, c1),
showing us that O = (0,0,0) is the zero triple for addition as well as multiplication since the triple
(a1, b1, c1) was not changed by the addition of (0,0,0). (Note that the 2nd method for addition could not be used in adding the zero triple to a triple because its expressions for the b and c values were obtained from an a-value of
a1 + a2 + 1 rather than the a-value of a1 + a2 which we used.)
Now this procedure is fine for adding (0,0,0) to any non-zero triple, but if we add (0,0,0) to the zero triple (0,0,0) by this method, we get
(0,0,0) + (0,0,0) = (a, b, c),
where a = a1 + a2 = 0 + 0 = 0,
b = (a2 – 1)/2 = (02 – 1)/2 = -1/2 ,
and c = b + 1 = -1/2 + 1 = 1/2,
which is absurd, since b and c are not even integers! This occurred, of course, because the a-value of our sum was 0 and the formulas for b and c only apply to odd integers. Thus, we shall simply state that
O + O = (0,0,0) + (0,0,0) = (0,0,0) = O.
Thus, if A = (a, b, c) is a non-zero Pythagorean triple and O = (0,0,0), we have
A x O = O and A + O = A and O + O = O.
7. Subtracting complete primitive Pythagorean triples
We shall now consider the subtraction of complete Pythagorean triples. If (a, b, c) is the difference between two triples (a1, b1, c1) and (a2, b2, c2), then
(a1, b1, c1) – (a2, b2, c2) = (a, b, c)
means that (a1, b1, c1 ) = (a2, b2, c2) + (a, b, c) = (a2 + a + 1, __ , __ ).
Equating the a-values, we have a1 = a2 + a + 1,
and solving this for a, we get a = a1 – a2 – 1, where a1 must be greater than a2 (a1 > a2),
so that a will be a positive integer.
Since (a, b, c) is complete, we have (from Theorem 47),
b = (a2 – 1)/2
= [ (a1 - a2 - 1)2 – 1 ] / 2
= [(a12 + a22 + 1 - 2a1a2 - 2a1 + 2a2) – 1] / 2
= (a12 + a22 - 2a1a2 - 2a1 + 2a2) / 2, and from (3) in section 6,
we have = [(2b1 + 1) + (2b2 + 1) - 2a1a2 - 2a1 + 2a2] / 2
= b1 + b2 + 1 – (a1 + a1a2 – a2),
and c = b + 1
= [b1 + b2 + 1 - (a1 + a1a2 - a2)] + 1
= (c1 – 1) + (c2 – 1) - (a1 + a1a2 - a2) + 2
= c1 + c2 – (a1 + a1a2 - a2).
This all gives us
Subtracting Complete Triples
If (a1, b1, c1) and (a2, b2, c2) are complete Pythagorean triples, a1 > a2, then
1st method: (a1, b1, c1) – (a2, b2, c2) = (a, b, c),
where a = a1 – a2 – 1, b = (a2 – 1)/2, and c = b + 1.
2nd method: (a1, b1, c1) – (a2, b2, c2)
= (a1 – a2 –1, b1+ b2 + 1 – d , c1 + c2 – d ),
where d = a1 + a1a2 – a2
________________________________________________________________
Example 4. Use both methods of subtraction to find (15, 112, 113) – (11, 60, 61).
1st method: (15, 112, 113) – (11, 60, 61) = (a, b, c), where a = 15 – 11 – 1 = 3,
b = (32 – 1)/2 = 4, and c = 4 + 1 = 5. Thus, (15, 112, 113) – (11, 60, 61) = (3, 4, 5).
2nd method: First, let’s calculate d = a1 + a1a2 – a2 = 15 + 15(11) – 11 = 169. Then,
(15, 112, 113) – (11, 60, 61) = (15 – 11 – 1, 112 + 60 + 1 – d, 113 + 61 – d )
= (3, 173 – d, 174 – d) = (3, 173 – 169, 174 – 169) = (3, 4, 5)
8. Negative Pythagorean triples
Now, what if we subtract the triple (a, b, c) from itself? Let’s see what we get. Using the 2nd method of subtraction, we first find d = a1 + a1a2 – a2 = a + a2 – a = a2. Then,
(a, b, c) – (a, b, c) = (a –a –1, b + b + 1 – d, c + c – d) = ( -1, (2b + 1) – a2, 2c – a2 ),
and since a2 = 2b+1 from (3) above, and c = b + 1, we have
= ( -1, a2 – a2, 2(b+1) – a2) = ( -1, 0, 2b + 2 – a2 )
= ( -1, 0, (2b + 1) – a2 + 1) = ( -1, 0, a2 – a2 + 1)
= ( -1, 0, 1), a new triple,
which is both complete (since c = b + 1) and Pythagorean since (-1)2 + 02 = 12 .
Now, this is very strange since we would expect to get the (0, 0, 0) triple whenever we subtract a triple from itself ! Instead, we got the new triple (-1, 0, 1), the first triple we have seen which has a negative a-value, and it reminds us of the integer - 1. Now if it acts like - 1, we would expect that multiplying it by itself would give us the triple (1,0,1), which, as we know, acts like the integer 1. Let’s see if this is so.
( -1,0,1) x ( -1,0,1) = ( -1(-1), 0(1) + 1(0), 0(0) + 1(1) ) = (1, 0, 1), which confirms our surmise!
Now if (-1,0,1) acts like the integer -1 in multiplication, let’s see what happens if we multiply it by the triple (3,4,5). Then,
(3,4,5) x (-1,0,1) = ( 3(-1), 4(1)+5(0), 4(0)+5(1) ) = (-3,4,5), and in a like
manner, (5,12,13) x ( -1,0,1) = ( -5,12,13),
and, in general (a, b, c) x ( -1,0,1) = ( -a, b, c). (1)
Now if a > 0, we shall call (a, b, c) a positive triple and (- a, b, c) a negative triple, and we shall say that
(- a, b, c) is the opposite of (a,b,c).
So we have just shown in (1) that multiplying a positive triple (a, b, c) by ( -1, 0, 1) changes it into a negative triple (-a, b, c).
Furthermore, if (-1,0,1) acts like the integer -1, then we would expect that adding it to a triple would give us that triple which is just before it in a list of complete triples ordered by their increasing a-values. Thus, we would expect that (5,12,13) + ( -1,0,1) would equal (3,4,5), the triple just before (5,12,13). However,
(5,12,13) + ( -1,0,1) = (5 + (-1) + 1, __ , __ ) = (5,12,13),
and (5,12,13) is not changed at all, making (-1, 0, 1) seem like the zero triple (0, 0, 0), which, of course, it is not!
Perhaps, in adding the positive triple (5,12,13) to the negative triple (-1,0,1), we should have subtracted rather than added 1 to the sum of their a-values. If so, then we would get
(5,12,13) + ( -1,0,1) = (5 + (-1) – 1, __ , __ ) = (3,4,5),
which IS the triple just before (5,12,13), as expected!
Apparently, when we add a positive and a negative triple, we must add their a-values and then subtract 1, whereas if adding two positive triples, we add their a-values and then add 1. But is this always the case?
To find out, let’s construct a table of Pythagorean triples containing both positive and negative triples along with the zero triple and ordered by their increasing a-values.
Table 2
m n a b c
--------------------------------------------
- 4 - 5 - 9 40 41
- 3 - 4 - 7 24 25
- 2 - 3 - 5 12 13
- 1 - 2 - 3 4 5
0 - 1 - 1 0 1
0 0 0 0 0
1 0 1 0 1
2 1 3 4 5
3 2 5 12 13
4 3 7 24 25
5 4 9 40 41
Now, what should be the rules for addition here? We have found that (1,0,1) acts like the integer 1 and
(-1,0,1) acts like the integer -1. Using these triples as guides to help us, let’s look at
a) (5,12,13) + (1,0,1) b) ( - 5,12,13) + ( -1,0,1) c) ( - 5,12,13) + (1,0,1)
a) Since (1,0,1) acts like the integer 1, it seems natural for (5,12,13) + (1,0,1) to equal the next higher triple in Table 2; namely, (7,24,25). Thus, we must add the a-values of (5,12,13) and (1,0,1), 5 + 1 = 6, and then add 1 more to get (7,24,25). Using this example as a pattern, we can state that, in general, if we are adding two triples
(a1, b1, c1) and (a2, b2, c2), whose a-values are both positive, then the a-value of their sum must be a1 + a2 + 1.
b) Since (-1,0,1) acts like the integer -1, it seems natural for ( -5,12,13) + (-1,0,1) to equal the next lower triple in Table 2; namely, ( -7, 24, 25). Thus, we must add the a-values of ( -5,12,13) and (-1,0,1); namely, ( - 5) + ( -1) = - 6,
and then subtract 1 more to get ( - 7, 24, 25). Using this as our pattern, we can say that if we are adding two triples (a1, b1, c1) and (a2, b2, c2), whose a-values are both negative, then the a-value of their sum must be a1+ a2 – 1.
However, if one of the triples is positive and the other negative, it gets a little more complicated.
c) Since (1,0,1) acts like the integer 1, it seems natural for (- 5,12,13) + (1,0,1) to be equal to the next higher triple in Table 2; namely, (-3,4,5). Thus, we must add the a-values of (- 5,12,13) and (1,0,1), - 5 + 1 = - 4, and then add 1 more to get (-3,4,5).
Now, consider the table below where, starting with (1,0,1), we have added positive triples with successively higher a-values to (-5,12,13).
Addition a-value of the sum
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(- 5,12,13) + (1,0,1) = (-3,4,5) - 3 = - 5 + 1 + 1 = a1 + a2 + 1
(- 5,12,13) + (3,4,5) = (-1,0,1) - 1 = - 5 + 3 + 1 = a1 + a2 + 1
(- 5,12,13) + (5,12,13) = (0,0,0) 0 = - 5 + 5 = a1 + a2
(- 5,12,13) + (7,24,25) = (1,0,1) 1 = - 5 + 7 – 1 = a1 + a2 – 1
(- 5,12,13) + (9,40,41) = (3,4,5) 3 = - 5 + 9 - 1 = a1 + a2 – 1
All of these additions are quite reasonable, since by adding successively increasing positive triples to
( -5,12,13), we find that the sums are also successively higher triples.
Looking closer, we see that in the first two additions, where the a-value of the negative triple is larger than the a-value of the positive triple in absolute value, we added 1 to their sum.
In the third addition, where the a-value of the negative triple is equal to the a-value of the positive triple in absolute value, we added nothing to their sum. and
In the last two additions, where the a-value of the negative triple is smaller than the a-value of the positive
triple in absolute value, we subtracted 1 from their sum.
So, using Table 2 and the results found in a), b), and c) above as patterns, we have
Addition of Complete Triples
If (a1, b1, c1) and (a2, b2, c2) are positive or negative complete triples or (0,0,0), then
(a1, b1, c1) + (a2, b2, c2) = (a, b, c), where
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
1. a1 + a2 + 1, if a1 and a2 are both positive,
2. a1 + a2 - 1, if a1 and a2 are both negative,
3. a) 0, if a1 + a2 = 0,
a = b) a1 if a2 = 0,
c) a2 if a1 = 0,
4. a1 + a2 + 1, if a1 and a2 are of opposite sign, and the negative number
is larger than the positive one in absolute value
5. a1 + a2 - 1, if a1 and a2 are of opposite sign, and the negative number
is smaller than the positive one in absolute value
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
(a2 – 1)/2, if a ¹ 0, b + 1, if a ¹ 0,
b = c =
0, if a = 0, 0, if a ¹ 0.
__________________________________________________________________________________
Let’s work a few problems to illustrate each of these rules of addition.
1. Find ( 7, 24, 25) + (11, 60, 61). Since a1 and a2 are both positive, we use rule 1. Thus,
a = 7+11+1 = 19, b = (192 – 1)/2 = 180, and c = 180+1 = 181, so
(7,24,25) + (11,60,61) = (19,180,181).
2. Find ( -3,4,5) + ( -9,40,41). Since a1 and a2 are both negative, we use rule 2. Thus,
a = -3 + (-9) – 1 = -13, b = ( (-13)2 – 1)/2 = 84, and c = 84+1 = 85, so
(- 3,4,5) + (- 9,40,41) = (-13,84,85).
3. Find (15, 112, 113) + ( -15, 112, 113). Since a1 + a2 = 0, we use rule 3. Thus,
a = 15 + (-15) = 0, b = 0, and c = 0, so
(15,112,113) + (-15,112,113) = (0,0,0).
4. Find ( -7, 24, 25) + (0, 0, 0). Since a2 = 0, we use rule 3. Thus,
a = -7, b = ( (-7)2 – 1)/2 = 24, and c = 24+1 = 25, so
(-7,24,25) + (0,0,0) = (-7,24,25).
5. Find (-15, 112, 113) + ( 9, 40, 41). Since a1 and a2 are of opposite signs, and the negative number (- 15) is larger than the positive one (9) in absolute value, we use rule 4. Thus,
a = - 15 + 9 + 1 = - 5, b = ( (-5)2 – 1)/2 = 12, and c = 12 + 1 = 13, so
(-15,112,113) + (9,40,41) = (- 5,12,13).
6. Find (11, 60, 61) + ( - 7, 24, 25). Since a1 and a2 are of opposite signs, and the negative number ( - 7) is smaller than the positive one (11) in absolute value, we use rule 5. Thus,
a = 11 + (-7) – 1 = 3, b = (32 – 1)/2 = 4, and c = 4 + 1 = 5, so
(11,60,61) + (-7,24,25) = (3,4,5).
In short, to find the a-value of the sum of two complete triples, find the sum of their two a-values, and
if both a-values are positive, add 1 to this sum,
if both a-values are negative, subtract 1 from this sum,
if one a-value is positive and one is negative,
1) add 1 to this sum if the absolute value of the negative one is larger than the positive one,
2) subtract 1 from this sum if the absolute value of the negative one is smaller than the positive one,
To find the b- and c- values, use b = (a2 – 1)/2, and c = b + 1.
If one of the triples is the zero triple (0, 0, 0), then their sum is the other triple, and if the sum of their two
a-values is 0, then the sum of the two triples is (0, 0, 0).
Let’s now consider subtracting both positive and negative triples. For integers, we know that
a – b = a + (-1)b = a + ( - b),
so patterning our subtraction on this, we have
Subtraction of Complete Triples
If (a1, b1, c1) and (a2, b2, c2) are positive or negative complete triples, then
(a1, b1, c1) – (a2, b2, c2) = (a1, b1, c1) + (-1, 0, 1) x (a2, b2, c2)
= (a1, b1, c1) + ( - a2, b2, c2).
________________________________________________________________
To subtract (a2, b2, c2) from (a1, b1, c1), we simply add its opposite to (a1, b1, c1).
a) (7, 24, 25) – (1,0,1) = (7, 24, 25) + ( -1,0,1) = (7 + (-1) – 1, __ , __ )
= (5, 12, 13), by rule 5 above,
b) ( - 9, 40, 41) – ( -3,4,5) = ( -9, 40, 41) + (3,4,5) = ( -9 + 3 + 1, __ , __ )
= ( - 5,12,13), by rule 4 above,
c) ( - 11, 60, 61) – ( - 11, 60, 61) = ( - 11, 60, 61) + (11, 60, 61) = (0, 0, 0), by rule 3 above,
d) (5,12,13) – ( - 3,4,5) = (5,12,13) + (3,4,5) = (5 + 3 + 1, __ , __ )
= (9,40,41), by rule 1 above.
If we wished, we could combine the rule for subtracting triples with the rules for adding complete triples above to come up with a complete list of rules for subtracting complete triples, but it is much easier to perform any subtractions by simply adding the opposite of the triple we wish to subtract.
9. The Distributive Property for Pythagorean triples
The distributive property for integers states that for any integers a, b, and c,
a(b + c) = ab + ac.
Accordingly, we might expect that if A = (a1, b1, c1), B = (a2, b2, c2), and C = (a3, b3, c3), are complete triples,
then A x (B + C) = A x B + A x C. (1)
However, this is not true. If both a1 and a2 are positive, we get
A x (B + C) = (a1, b1, c1) x [(a2, b2, c2) + (a3, b3, c3)]
= (a1, b1, c1) x (a2 + a3 + 1, __ , __ )
= ([a1(a2 + a3 + 1), __ , __ )
= (a1a2 + a1a3 + a1, __ , __ ), (2)
whereas, A x B + A x C = (a1, b1, c1) x (a2, b2, c2) + (a1, b1, c1) x (a3, b3, c3)
= (a1a2 , __ , __ ) + (a1a3, __ , __ )
= (a1a2 + a1a3 + 1, __ , __ ). (3)
Since (2) and (3) are NOT identical, we have shown (1) is not true for complete Pythagorean triples.
To make the a-values in (2) and (3) identical, we need to add a1 to and remove 1 from the a-value of (3).
Adding A = (a1, b1, c1) to (3), we get (a1a2 + a1a3 + 1, __ , __ ) + (a1, b1, c1)
= (a1a2 + a1a3 + 1 + a1 + 1, __ , __ )
= (a1a2 + a1a3 + a1 + 2, __ , __ ). (4)
Now in (4), we have the a1 we needed, but need to get rid of the 2.
Subtracting (1,0,1) from (4), we get (a1a2 + a1a3 + a1 + 2, __ , __ ) – (1,0,1)
= (a1a2 + a1a3 + a1 + 2, __ , __ ) + ( - 1,0,1), and using Rule 5 for
addition, we get = (a1a2 + a1a3 + a1 + 2 - 1 - 1, __ , __ ),
= (a1a2 + a1a3 + a1, __ , __ ), which is identical to (2), as desired.
Thus, for positive complete triples, our distributive property is
Distributive Property for Positive Complete Triples
If A, B, and C are positive complete triples, then
A x (B + C) = A x B + A x C + A – (1,0,1).
___________________________________________
a somewhat complicated, but interesting, statement!
Example
Adding inside the brackets first:
(3,4,5) x [ (5,12,13) + (7,24,25) ] = (3,4,5) x (13, 84,85)
= (39, 760,761)
Multiplying first:
(3,4,5) x [ (5,12,13) + (7,24,25) ] = (15,112,113) + (21,220,221) + (3,4,5) – (1,0,1)
= (37,684,685) + (3,4,5) – (1,0,1)
= (41, 840,841) – (1,0,1)
= (39, 760,761)
If A, B, and C are all negative triples, we can show that
A x (B + C) = A x B + A x C – A – (1,0,1).
And we can certainly find other expressions for the distributive property for those A’s, B’s and C’s which have different signs. But I think we’ve done enough for now. There will be other days for these discoveries and more, I’m sure.
So that’s it! We have found many, many patterns in our study of right triangles and Pythagorean triples, and it has been a most fascinating and, above all, an interesting pastime! The joy we have found in discovering these patterns has been wonderful, but you know, the time we have spent and the effort we have made in discovering these patterns have given us the most fun! Here’s to finding other patterns in these triangles and triples in the future, because I know that somewhere, out there, there are more.
October 9, 2005